Research Journal of Biological Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6087ISSN: Print 1815-8846
102
Views
0
Downloads
Abstract
There are conflicting results in the literature concerning preemptive effect of ketamine. The aim of our study was the clinical evaluation of preemptive perioperative analgesia with low-doses ketamine. We conducted a randomized, prospective and double blind study: Thirty patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were allocated randomly to receive boluses of either ketamine 0.15 mg kg 1 or normal saline (placebo) 5 min before surgical incision. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were similar in two groups. After surgery the following parameters were considered: 1- time of first request for analgesic and total dose of consumed analgesic; 2-VAS and VRS in 12 h intervals for 2 day, for assessment of the effectiveness of analgesia; 3-postoperative nausea and Vomiting 93.3% of patients in control group and 66.6% of patients in ketamine group received analgesic postoperatively and the relation between the first analgesia request time and ketamine use was significant (t = 2.68 and 0.95 t14 = 1.76). Frequency and total dose of analgesic between 2 groups were different and were lower in ketamine group than control group (p< 0.003). Mean VAS in 12 (p< 0.028), 24 (p< 0.027), 36 (p< 0.012) and 48 h (p< 0.028) after operation was significantly lower in ketamine group than control group. Also, Mean VRS in 12 (p< 0.02) and 24 h (p< 0.042) after operation was significantly lower in ketamine group than control group, but Mean VRS in 36 (p< 0.02) and 48 h (p< 0.042) after operation was not significantly different between 2 groups (p< 0.13). We conclude that ketamine provide clinicians with tool to improve postoperative pain management and to reduce analgesic doses after surgery.
How to cite this article:
Amir-Abbas Kianfar , Masoud Parish , Jafar Rahimi Panahi , Kamran Shadvar , Isa Bilejani and Rasoul Azarfarin . Low-Dose Ketamine for Postoperative Analgesia in Elective Open Cholecystectomy.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/rjbsci.2008.201.205
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-8846/rjbsci.2008.201.205