The Cardiology
ISSN: Online 1993-6117ISSN: Print 1811-8194
131
Views
1
Downloads
Early Complications and Malfunctions of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: Single Versus Dual Chamber Pacemaker Implantation
Maryam Moshkani Farahani , Ataallah Bagherzadeh , Majid Hagh joo and Mohammad Ali Sadr Ameli
Page: 7-10 | Received 21 Sep 2022, Published online: 21 Sep 2022
Full Text Reference XML File PDF File
Abstract
Background-Implantation of transvenous Permanent Pacemakers (PPM) has become standard therapy for sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular conduction abnormalities. It plays an important role in improving quality of life and preventing death in this group of patients. This study conducted on 477 patients during their hospitalization and eight weeks after their discharge. Complete heart block was the most frequent indication for pacemaker implantation (48.8%).The most frequent early complications of implantations were hematoma (2.1%), hemothorax (0.5%). The most frequent malfunctions were lead displacement (1.9%), exit block (1.5%) and atrial undersensing (1%). There were no significant difference between single and dual chamber PPM in regard to complications and malfunctions (p=0.56). PPM implantations in our center are associated with a low incidence of early complications and malfunctions in comparison with other qualified centers. There is no significant difference between early complications of single versus dual chamber PPMs.
How to cite this article:
Maryam Moshkani Farahani , Ataallah Bagherzadeh , Majid Hagh joo and Mohammad Ali Sadr Ameli . Early Complications and Malfunctions of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: Single Versus Dual Chamber Pacemaker Implantation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/tcard.2006.7.10
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1811-8194/tcard.2006.7.10